Should the government play an active role in the censorship of social media? Individual companies like Twitter are taking immediate action to censor speech. Those companies are not obligated to protect 1st Amendment freedoms in the same way government must when it passes laws. Undoubtedly, there will be growing calls for the government to take a more active, regulatory role instead of relying on these private companies to do it on a case-by-case basis. Check out this argument essay prompt :.
This is reasonable censorship and it does not damage our political rights to freedom of speech. Usually once the censorship is enacted through regulatory or judiciary means it is much difficult to lift the censorship or reduce its scope. Is internet censorship necessary essay. Censorship Argumentative Essay Restricting peoples freedom of speech is not only against the law but it also limits access to information — no matter how sensitive the topic. This is where internet censorship is favored by a lot of people so that they are able to limit their childs exposure to online content for their own good.
The Essay Contest has ended. You can view the winners here. The next contest will open by early September, Open to juniors and seniors in U.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for redress of grievances. The common reading of the First Amendment is that commitment to free speech is not the acceptance of only non-controversial expressions that enjoy general approval. To accept a commitment to the First Amendment means, in the words of Justice Holmes, "freedom for what we hate. Writers may often be the spokesmen of their culture, or they may stand to the side, attempting to describe and evaluate that culture.